The leading role of design thinking in education is examined from a multi-dimensional perspective
Abstract
👉This video link explains in detail what is design thinking
The relationship between "critically review" and design thinking
Contact podcast:
At 11:30, the podcast mentions the LMS platform as a powerful learning management system, which clarifies the learning difficulties encountered by students through the interpretation of student data, and constantly helps educators improve learning design, which is in line with the iterative nature of design thinking, while striving to seek the optimal solution. Technology, as an adjunct to design thinking, aims to create a better learning environment by focusing on learner-centered core principles. The LMS platform allows:
1. Create interactive mode, students conduct online debate, so as to guide students to participate in learning more actively
2. Track learners' progress and give them personalized feedback
3. Design different modules or assignments according to the student's individual learning style or progress
These technical support for the in-depth evaluation of students' learning research results, not only feedback learners' learning harvest, but also analyze learners' remaining problems, in line with the "critically review" dialectical perspective of the main features.
Learning design is the concrete practice of applying design thinking, and design thinking provides the methodology and framework of learning design. The two promote each other, jointly promote educational innovation, and make teaching more targeted, flexible and creative.
Article and Podcast comparison
Bower's articles and podcasts focus on design thinking, emphasizing that design thinking is characterized by creativity, flexibility, critical thinking, and plays an important role in the field of education. Secondly, both of them emphasize the irreplaceable role of technology in learning design, such as the use of LMS and OERD, which are conducive to optimizing teaching design and improving students' learning outcomes. At the same time, both involve the influence of technology integration on the future development trend of education, and help learners to develop their own learning routes.
However, the podcast uses a more relaxed dialogue mode, which is suitable for the quick understanding of ordinary listeners. Compared with Bower's article, the article is obviously more academic and involves a large number of references to demonstrate the point of view, which is more suitable for researchers or educators who want to understand the content of design thinking. At the same time, the podcast will integrate the teaching design concept into concrete practice and introduce case analysis, so that the audience can better feel how the integration of technology changes the teaching design, rather than the framework theory in the article.
What does podcasting need to improve?
1. The podcast content is too descriptive and the audio time is long, which may wear the audience's patience. I believe that the best blog content should be reasonably controlled frequently and inform the audience of the best quality content in the fastest way.
2. The podcast content lacks data support and mainly relies on the original literature review, but there is no substantive data to support the argument. For example, the podcast discusses LMS as a learning system to help students improve their learning experience, but there is no data to support the results of students' experience.
How to improve?
1. Use Notebook LM, Chatgpt and other AI software to help find data support
2. Use Notebook LM to streamline blog content
AI statement
I use ChatGPT to quickly define and understand the specific meaning of design thinking, critical review, and use the literature to substantiate. At the same time, Notebook LM is used to help quickly find literature, summarize literature content, analyze key parts of the article, and give ideas. Finally, ChatGPT was used to generate related pictures. I promise that the content of this blog has been reviewed and is original.
Reference
Panke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281-306.
Bower, M. (2017). Design of Technology-Enhanced Learning: Integrating Research and Practice. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Joughin, G. (2008). Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education: A critical review. Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education, 1-15.
Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2001). Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International, 38(2-3), 127-132.


评论
发表评论